Loaded data file C:\Users\zirbel\Documents\JAR3D\\HL\3.48\diagnostic\HL_RandomMotifSequencesNonCan_11.mat
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AUUU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.56, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.29, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GAGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.08, deficit  2.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  77.27, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UAAA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.06, deficit  1.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUUA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.55, deficit  0.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18722.1,  4 NTs,                 GUCUC,score      -6.15, deficit  2.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.45, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-F                               
UUUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.56, deficit  2.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.18, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUCC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.03, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AGAU 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -5.00, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.14, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UCUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -7.52, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.24, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -6.05, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.56, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  3.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.54, deficit  0.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
AUCU 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.05, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.98, deficit  2.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.31, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
UGAA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.84, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.76, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUCG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -3.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
GCCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.39, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.55, deficit  1.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.90, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -3.66, deficit  0.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.24, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UAGA 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.94, deficit  2.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  78.71, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_46546.1,  4 NTs,                  CUUG,score      -4.34, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.62, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-F-s35                           
CGAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score      -4.45, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  83.94, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAGAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -4.81, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  88.44, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CCAAG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.89, deficit  1.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.90, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
UGCAA 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.60, deficit  0.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.57, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UUGCA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.89, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CGAGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.71, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UACGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_61984.1,  3 NTs,                 CUCGG,score      -7.76, deficit  3.75, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.91, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
CCUCG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.38, deficit  1.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.27, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAGCC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -6.04, deficit  2.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.89, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GUACC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -4.96, deficit  1.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUUCG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -5.12, deficit  1.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  82.25, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.71, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
AGAAU 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.98, deficit  0.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUAUG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.69, deficit  0.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
GGGAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GUAUC 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.87, deficit  0.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  95.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUGCC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.88, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
AGGGU 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_60914.1,  4 NTs,                 CUGGG,score      -4.90, deficit  1.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.85, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.55, deficit  0.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  96.13, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGUAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -6.51, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
UAAAA 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -3.95, deficit  0.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.42, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGGAU 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.36, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.55, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
GGUAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -4.27, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s55                                 
AACAU 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_98557.4,  3 NTs,                 CAGAG,score      -5.06, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.22, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGUGA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
UACCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -7.16, deficit  2.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
UUUUG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -4.40, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.88, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.11, deficit  0.14, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.51, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GCCAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_99223.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUAA,score      -4.11, deficit  0.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.99, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s55-s35                         
CGUGG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_05667.1,  3 NTs,                 GGUAC,score      -5.45, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55                                 
GAUGC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_95237.1,  4 NTs,                 UUUGA,score      -4.91, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.84, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35                         
CAAGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.94, deficit  0.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CUUUG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_33507.2,  4 NTs,                 UUUUA,score      -3.09, deficit  0.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.65, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s55                           
GCUUC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_70970.1,  5 NTs,                 UCUAA,score      -5.32, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-s35                             
CUGUG 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -3.43, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
UGAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -6.00, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.35, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
UGAAA 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.97, deficit  0.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  91.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
GGAGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_05692.1,  3 NTs,                CGUAGG,score      -7.79, deficit  1.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.78, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CGCGG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_69459.1,  2 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -7.74, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW                                     
GGAAC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_79272.2,  5 NTs,                 CGCAG,score      -3.91, deficit  0.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CUAAUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.47, deficit  0.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAGG 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.16, deficit  5.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.98, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UGAAAA 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.18, deficit  0.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  93.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AGGAGU 1  Matches 17; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -8.71, deficit  6.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.93, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
CUGACG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
CUAAUG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -5.47, deficit  0.09, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
GUGAUC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_29487.1,  6 NTs,                CUGAUG,score      -2.54, deficit  0.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-F-s35-s55                       
AUAGUU 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_94352.4,  5 NTs,               CUAAGUG,score      -5.36, deficit  0.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.00, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-F                         
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUUUC 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.01, deficit -0.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.01, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
GUUCUC 1  Matches 33; best is  HL_69353.6,  3 NTs,                  CUAG,score     -10.28, deficit  7.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.58, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGCUGC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_94386.1,  6 NTs,               GUGAAGC,score      -6.29, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.84, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-F-s35                         
CGUGAG 1  Matches 28; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -5.48, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CAGAGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUUCCG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_46463.1,  4 NTs,                UUUCGA,score      -5.15, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F                                 
CGAAGG 1  Matches 24; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.60, deficit  2.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.46, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CUCACG 1  Matches  9; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.49, deficit  4.74, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUCAC 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -7.38, deficit  4.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.84, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
UGACAG 1  Matches 20; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -7.35, deficit  5.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.01, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCUUC 1  Matches 27; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -3.85, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGACAG 1  Matches 28; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.47, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.50, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCAUAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_69941.1,  4 NTs,                CGCGUG,score      -6.93, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUCAUG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_00996.1,  5 NTs,                GUCUUC,score      -5.02, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35                 
CGGAAG 1  Matches 29; best is  HL_36982.3,  3 NTs,                 CUGUG,score      -9.82, deficit  6.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  32.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GCGGUC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32617.1,  5 NTs,                UUGGUA,score      -6.57, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSH                             
GUUAUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -4.52, deficit  0.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  99.22, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55                             
GGUCAC 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_44781.1,  5 NTs,                GUUCAC,score      -3.80, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35             
GGUAAC 1  Matches 36; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.90, deficit  1.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  81.47, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAGAG 1  Matches 26; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.08, deficit  0.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  90.66, ed 99, 0 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
UCUUCA 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -5.60, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.42, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GUUACC 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_22447.1,  4 NTs,                UUUUCA,score      -6.29, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s53-s55                         
GGCAAC 1  Matches 31; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.18, deficit  2.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  74.83, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGGCAG 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_57204.1,  5 NTs,                UGGAAA,score      -5.59, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.97, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-F-F-s35                         
CGAAAG 1  Matches 32; best is  HL_06569.1,  5 NTs,                AGAAUU,score      -6.07, deficit  0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  94.63, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CCAAAG 1  Matches 27; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -5.62, deficit  3.87, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.89, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGCGAG 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -7.43, deficit  0.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.75, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
UUAAUG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_96776.2,  6 NTs,                AAAAUU,score      -7.64, deficit  2.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.66, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F                   
CGCCGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -5.97, deficit  0.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.61, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGGG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -7.24, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.29, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
GUUGUC 1  Matches 30; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -5.62, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
CAAGCG 1  Matches 18; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -6.58, deficit  4.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.93, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CCGAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_15942.4,  4 NTs,                UUUAGG,score      -6.46, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  66.54, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35                                 
CUCUCG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.56, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.07, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
AUAUCU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_76360.1,  5 NTs,                GUGUCC,score      -5.57, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.98, ed 99, 1 cWW-F-F-F                               
GAUUGC 1  Matches 22; best is  HL_82678.2,  6 NTs,               CAUGUGG,score      -5.24, deficit  0.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F                     
CUUUUG 1  Matches 31; best is  HL_96283.1,  3 NTs,                CUUAUG,score      -3.94, deficit -0.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  73.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55                             
AGCAAU 1  Matches 30; best is HL_43074.14,  6 NTs,                UGAAAA,score      -4.91, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.32, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUGG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.06, deficit  1.79, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.56, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
UGAAUGA 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_40469.1,  4 NTs,               CGAAUAG,score      -6.19, deficit  1.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.23, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F                           
CGGGAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_68304.6,  6 NTs,               CGACGAG,score      -8.15, deficit  2.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
GUUAUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_83225.1,  4 NTs,               CGUAUUG,score      -5.91, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CGCAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
AAUUCCU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02733.4,  6 NTs,               CAUGCCG,score      -3.95, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  89.87, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGAACG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -8.16, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
GCCAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -6.66, deficit  1.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CUCUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
GGAACAC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -5.36, deficit  0.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  97.78, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAUAU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -7.39, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.33, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGAC 1  Matches 24; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.66, deficit  1.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  84.10, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CUGCCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_98995.6,  6 NTs,                UACCAA,score      -7.82, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.13, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CGCAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_90961.1,  4 NTs,               CGCAUAG,score      -5.90, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.43, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55                     
CGUUGAG 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -9.70, deficit  3.77, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  69.05, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CUUGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -7.85, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.95, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CUCACUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -6.26, deficit  2.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
AUUAACU 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.16, deficit  2.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.36, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
UUGUACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -8.79, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
CCGAGCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_28567.3,  6 NTs,                GAGUAC,score      -9.28, deficit  4.24, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.81, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
CUGAGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.28, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGCAAAG 1  Matches 23; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -6.82, deficit  1.10, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
CGAAAGG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
UGGGUGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_37407.1,  5 NTs,               GAGUAUC,score      -6.85, deficit  1.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.01, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35                     
UGUUUAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score     -10.16, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
GACCGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_43527.1,  6 NTs,               CGCCGAG,score      -6.91, deficit  1.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.77, ed 99, 1 cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CAAAUGG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -8.06, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
CUAUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_50374.1,  4 NTs,               UAAUUCA,score      -6.96, deficit  1.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35                         
GGCUCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_66171.2,  5 NTs,              CGACACAG,score      -9.71, deficit  6.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.04, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35                     
CAGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -7.19, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
GCAAUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_86880.4,  5 NTs,               GCUCGUC,score      -8.03, deficit  2.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35                     
CGAGGAG 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_04891.1,  6 NTs,                CGAGAG,score      -5.77, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  92.70, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35             
UUCUUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_25183.1,  4 NTs,               CUGUUCG,score      -8.79, deficit  3.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.74, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35                                 
GUAACCC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_30937.1,  6 NTs,               GUAACGC,score      -5.66, deficit  1.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.35, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35                     
CCAGCCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43610.4,  7 NTs,               GGAGACC,score      -8.54, deficit  5.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35           
CUAAACG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_16845.5,  5 NTs,               CUUAUCG,score      -6.44, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.50, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35                 
GGAGAGC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.44, deficit  0.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.33, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CUGGGUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -9.23, deficit  4.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.18, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
AGACAGU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -8.41, deficit  2.92, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
CACAAGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_12053.1,  5 NTs,               CGCAACG,score      -7.08, deficit  1.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35                 
GAAGAGC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_59445.1,  7 NTs,               CAAUAGG,score      -6.17, deficit  1.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.48, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35                   
CUGAGCG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.28, deficit  4.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.83, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CGCGAAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score      -9.22, deficit  1.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.31, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
GGUCCAC 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_49196.2,  6 NTs,             AUUCCCAUU,score      -7.43, deficit  1.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.41, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35                 
CUCUGUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93573.1,  6 NTs,               CCUUGUG,score      -7.29, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-s35                         
AGUCGGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -8.96, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.21, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
CACCUGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_01472.3,  6 NTs,               GUCCGGC,score      -5.55, deficit  1.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  41.45, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53                   
GGAGCAC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_02361.5,  6 NTs,               UGAACAA,score      -6.72, deficit  1.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  51.86, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35                 
CGAGAGG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_16898.2,  5 NTs,               UGAAAGG,score      -6.18, deficit  0.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.12, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55                 
GCUCUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_26055.5,  7 NTs,              GUUUCUAC,score      -5.03, deficit  0.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  70.25, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
AGUUAGAU 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_59297.1,  6 NTs,              GCUUAGGC,score      -8.15, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s33-F-F                         
UUUAUAUG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -9.25, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.19, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GGAUAAAC 1  Matches 15; best is  HL_01187.1,  7 NTs,              GAAUUAAC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35             
CAGCCUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.97, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUGAGAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.98, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  79.30, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGGGCCGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -9.17, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.97, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GACUUUGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_12703.2,  5 NTs,                 GGCCC,score      -8.44, deficit  4.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.16, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35                     
AUGGAGUU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score      -7.90, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.63, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
GCAACAAC 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_72451.4,  8 NTs,              GGAACAAC,score      -4.65, deficit  1.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  54.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35                 
AUUGCAUU 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score     -12.17, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CUUUUUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -8.11, deficit  3.47, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
CGAGAAGG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.73, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CAUGAAAG 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_63285.1,  8 NTs,              GUUAAAAC,score      -8.17, deficit  3.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.40, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35       
CUUUGUUG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -9.46, deficit  3.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.61, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CGAGAUGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.27, deficit  1.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GGUAAGAC 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.01, deficit  1.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUAGUCUU 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score     -10.18, deficit  6.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.36, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
GGAUCAGC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_01181.4,  7 NTs,              GCACCGUC,score      -7.80, deficit  1.46, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAAUAAG 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_23090.1,  8 NTs,             CGACAUAAG,score      -9.02, deficit  3.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.06, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAGCGAAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -12.97, deficit  5.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.15, ed 99, 1 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CAGCCCGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -9.97, deficit  3.33, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
UCAUGUAG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score     -11.59, deficit  5.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.04, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
UAGCAAAA 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_35888.1,  7 NTs,              AGGCAAUU,score      -7.63, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.15, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35               
CGGAAAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CUUUCAUG 1  Matches 18; best is  HL_23219.1,  6 NTs,              CGUUAAUG,score      -6.40, deficit  1.43, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55 
GGUCGCGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score     -10.58, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.32, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UCCACUCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58200.1,  5 NTs,             CCUCACACG,score     -12.06, deficit  4.99, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.55, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s55                         
GUCGAGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -7.40, deficit  3.53, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.51, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
UGAGAAGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score     -11.02, deficit  4.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CGGAAAGG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_27757.1,  6 NTs,              CGGAAAGG,score      -4.83, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore 100.00, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F                   
CCGCCAAG 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -7.27, deficit  0.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  71.52, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGUAAGAG 1  Matches 21; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -7.11, deficit  1.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  59.17, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUUUUUUC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_69677.1,  5 NTs,               CUUUUUG,score      -8.19, deficit  3.54, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s33-F                           
GGAACGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -8.42, deficit  0.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.12, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGAUUUAU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_94651.1,  7 NTs,              CGUUCUAG,score      -6.84, deficit  2.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.59, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55                 
UAGCCGAA 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -12.33, deficit  5.01, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CGAGUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -8.82, deficit  3.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
UGGGGAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48636.1,  6 NTs,             UGUGAGAGG,score      -9.64, deficit  3.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55                       
CUCCUUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_06645.1,  6 NTs,              CUUCAACG,score      -7.25, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35                     
CUGGCUCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_17899.1,  8 NTs,              GUGUCUAC,score      -6.03, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  48.06, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35         
CUGAGCCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_46891.2,  8 NTs,              AUGGUUGU,score      -7.68, deficit  1.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUUAGGUC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_54035.5,  7 NTs,              AUUGAGUU,score      -6.00, deficit  1.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  60.38, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
GUACUAUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_49194.1,  7 NTs,              GGACGAUC,score      -7.00, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35                 
GGAAGUAC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_92681.4,  7 NTs,              UGAAGAAG,score      -6.34, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.60, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CCCGUAAG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -8.28, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  50.68, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GUCUAAUC 1  Matches 12; best is  HL_08002.5,  8 NTs,              GUAGAGUC,score      -8.23, deficit  4.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35                 
AGUUGAGU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.31, deficit  2.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.83, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGGACCC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_68493.4,  7 NTs,              CUGGGAUG,score     -10.64, deficit  6.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.10, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35         
CAAGUUAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_84050.1,  6 NTs,              CCAGUUAG,score      -7.21, deficit  1.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  67.54, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55                     
UGUUCGGA 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_80105.3,  7 NTs,              ACUUCGGU,score      -8.89, deficit  2.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  58.79, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35                 
CGGAAGAAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -10.16, deficit  2.08, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.70, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CCAUUUACG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.18, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  46.21, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
GGGAACUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_17926.4,  9 NTs,             UGUAAGUAA,score     -11.72, deficit  3.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.91, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAGCAAGGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score      -9.82, deficit  2.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
AGCGGCGAU 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_48810.1,  7 NTs,           CAGCUGGUUAG,score     -14.13, deficit  6.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.94, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-s35-s35-F                       
CUAUUCCCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.41, deficit  3.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.59, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GGCCAAGGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_46142.7,  8 NTs,              UUACUUGA,score     -10.25, deficit  2.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  40.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAGACACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.56, deficit  2.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGUAAGCGC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score     -10.38, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.13, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CUGUUGGUG 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.25, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.90, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
UUAUAAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -13.37, deficit  8.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GCAUAUAAC 1  Matches 16; best is  HL_88858.1,  6 NTs,             CCUGAUAAG,score      -7.26, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.75, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35         
GCAGGCCAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_05018.4,  8 NTs,             GAAGACCAC,score     -10.46, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.62, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GGAGUCAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
GUGAAGUUC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.24, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.99, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
CCUUCCAAG 1  Matches 20; best is  HL_59710.7,  9 NTs,             GCUCAUAAC,score      -7.82, deficit  3.41, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  57.08, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CAGCCACGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_26501.1,  8 NTs,            CAGCUACUCG,score     -11.50, deficit  4.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F                 
CUAUCAUCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -9.52, deficit  3.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.73, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
UCAGGGUUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -11.40, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.26, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
GUUAAUGCC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -13.81, deficit  5.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.80, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UCUCCAAAG 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_67052.1,  8 NTs,             ACUCUAAAU,score      -9.41, deficit  3.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  61.41, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
CGUAUUGGG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_93727.3,  8 NTs,              GGUGGCUC,score      -9.61, deficit  3.83, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.47, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GUGCCACUC 1  Matches  9; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.06, deficit  7.55, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.19, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GGGCCAAAC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score      -7.89, deficit  1.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  68.03, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CCCCGUUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.62, deficit  4.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.16, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GUUUUGUCC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_36207.1,  8 NTs,             CCUUUCACG,score      -8.43, deficit  2.45, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55     
AGGUGAGAU 1  Matches 14; best is  HL_27335.1,  6 NTs,             ACUGCAGAU,score     -10.23, deficit  3.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.87, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35                     
UUACGGUCG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_55511.1,  5 NTs,             UAACGGUAG,score     -12.67, deficit  3.71, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53                     
CAUCGACAG 1  Matches 13; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.81, deficit  3.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  20.93, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
CGAGUGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -13.63, deficit  6.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.53, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GCGAGAAUC 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_08748.1,  9 NTs,             ACUCAUACU,score     -10.43, deficit  3.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  53.99, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CUGAAAUUG 1  Matches 13; best is HL_33239.14,  9 NTs,             GUUCGAUUC,score      -9.11, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  55.07, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35         
CGUCUGGGG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -11.46, deficit  5.36, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.08, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CACCAUUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_20743.2,  8 NTs,             GGAUAUGGC,score      -8.62, deficit  3.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.44, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35         
GCCGAAACC 1  Matches 11; best is  HL_73266.3,  9 NTs,             ACCGUAAAU,score      -8.81, deficit  3.15, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.20, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CGCCUGAAG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_66703.1,  7 NTs,             UGGCUAAAA,score     -10.27, deficit  3.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.01, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35         
CAUGGUUGG 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -10.04, deficit  2.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
AUACAUUCU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score     -10.63, deficit  4.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GUUUCUAUC 1  Matches 17; best is  HL_34135.1,  7 NTs,             UUUUUGAUA,score      -8.89, deficit  2.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.32, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35     
CUAGGUGUG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_14725.1,  9 NTs,             UUCAGUGUG,score      -8.72, deficit  4.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.71, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35     
AUGGUGUUU 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_67044.1,  8 NTs,             AUGUCGUUU,score      -8.16, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35               
GCUCGUUCC 1  Matches 10; best is  HL_93436.1,  7 NTs,             GUUCGAUCC,score      -7.87, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  44.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-F-s35-s35                       
GAUUCCAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_68742.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCCAAG,score      -9.85, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.57, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35             
CAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -8.32, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  38.02, ed 99, 2 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UGACGAAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.52, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGUGGACAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_35010.1,  8 NTs,             CUUGCAAAG,score      -9.57, deficit  3.07, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.10, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35     
GGGGUAGAC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -10.44, deficit  2.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCCUAGAUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_41851.1,  9 NTs,             CCUUACGAG,score     -12.07, deficit  6.52, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35 
CCGCGAAAG 1  Matches 19; best is  HL_42733.3,  8 NTs,             CGGCGAAAG,score     -10.27, deficit  1.96, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  56.73, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35         
UUAAUCUUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_73793.2,  8 NTs,             GAUAAAAGC,score     -13.59, deficit  7.49, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.58, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUCGGUAACG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.38, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.35, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
CUGUUGUUUG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -12.08, deficit  4.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GUUUCCAGCC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -11.81, deficit  1.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUGCGCUCCG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_05123.1,  9 NTs,            ACGGGGAGUU,score     -11.88, deficit  4.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.68, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
GCUAUAACUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -12.82, deficit  6.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.65, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
GUUUAGUUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score     -10.44, deficit  5.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.16, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGUGAUGAAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score      -7.53, deficit  1.25, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.93, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GGCAUGAAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -9.32, deficit  2.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  65.70, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGUGUGAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -10.61, deficit  3.30, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.23, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUCUUGUUUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_70682.1,  8 NTs,            GUCAAGAUUC,score     -10.30, deficit  4.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35         
CGUUUGUGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -15.43, deficit  9.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.20, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UUCGGAUUUA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -10.51, deficit  5.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.26, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GAGUGUGCGC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_81327.2,  5 NTs,            CAGCCGGUAG,score     -10.16, deficit  2.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.21, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
GUGCUUGUUC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_37846.1,  7 NTs,            CUCCUCGCUG,score      -9.93, deficit  2.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55             
GGAUACGUAC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_99402.3, 10 NTs,            CGAUUACCUG,score     -11.81, deficit  5.35, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35     
ACCCGUUGUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_03847.1, 10 NTs,            GCUGGCGGUC,score     -11.04, deficit  4.48, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.48, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35     
UUACCGUGUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -15.86, deficit  8.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  35.20, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CGAGAAAAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score      -9.80, deficit  1.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  42.85, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
GUCCCGGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_23537.2, 10 NTs,            GUCCCAAGCC,score     -10.71, deficit  6.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.77, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35         
GGUGUGGAAC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score      -7.55, deficit  0.23, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  98.43, ed 99, 0 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAUGAAUCGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score     -11.56, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.08, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
CUGCCGUUCG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -11.83, deficit  7.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGUCAAUGAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_83704.1,  8 NTs,            GGUGAAUGAC,score      -8.41, deficit  0.22, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  76.60, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F           
GUAUCAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -13.38, deficit  5.84, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.32, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGAAUAUAAA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49213.1, 10 NTs,            GGAAAUGAAC,score     -11.59, deficit  5.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.58, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GAGCGUGAGC 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_88225.1,  6 NTs,             CAGGGGUAG,score     -10.88, deficit  3.57, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  36.07, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35                     
CGGCCAAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.07, deficit  2.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.87, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GAAAAAAAGC 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_49223.1,  7 NTs,             GAAAAAAGC,score      -9.73, deficit  3.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  49.88, ed 99, 1 cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAUAGAGGAG 1  Matches  8; best is  HL_06048.1,  9 NTs,            CAAGAAAGAG,score     -10.41, deficit  2.50, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35 
CGGUCUUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97049.1,  7 NTs,            CAGUCGGUAG,score     -12.28, deficit  2.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.89, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH                     
GGGGAAAUGC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_87219.4, 10 NTs,           GAUUAGAUACC,score     -12.29, deficit  4.76, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CACGUAGAAG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_24323.1, 10 NTs,            GAAGUGCAAC,score      -9.71, deficit  3.27, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUUUCAAUUG 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_78457.3,  8 NTs,            GUUAAUAUUC,score      -8.39, deficit  3.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  39.66, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35         
GGCUGUUAGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.46, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  24.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGUUCUUUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_32458.2,  9 NTs,           GGUUCGAAUCC,score     -15.13, deficit  7.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.96, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35     
GGCAGAUAGC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_97733.1,  8 NTs,            CCCGGUCAGG,score     -11.90, deficit  3.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.97, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55         
GGUUAUUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -10.93, deficit  1.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.11, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGGGUGUC 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_10536.1, 10 NTs,            GUUGGAUAUC,score     -11.52, deficit  6.51, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  12.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35   
GGUUUUAAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_32255.1, 10 NTs,            UUUUUUAAUG,score     -11.63, deficit  5.69, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  31.77, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35
AUUAAGCAUU 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -13.11, deficit  7.34, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.83, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUGUCACAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_36421.4,  9 NTs,             AGUUCAUAU,score     -14.94, deficit 11.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.96, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CAGUCAAGCG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_96854.1,  9 NTs,            GACUCAACAC,score     -10.53, deficit  3.37, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.88, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35                 
CAUAAUAACG 1  Matches  4; best is  HL_78724.1,  8 NTs,             AAAAUCACU,score     -12.49, deficit  5.98, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.39, ed 99, 2 cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35                     
GGGCAUCCAC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score      -9.80, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.25, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
AGAGCAAAAU 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_39334.4,  7 NTs,            CGUUGAAAAG,score     -12.99, deficit  6.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.30, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55 
GCCUAAGGAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_18218.2,  6 NTs,             GCCUAGGAC,score     -11.94, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.69, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35                     
CGAAACCUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_38513.1, 10 NTs,            UCAAGCCUAG,score     -12.01, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35           
UGCCGAGAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -12.68, deficit  2.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.14, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CUUGAAAUACG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -13.83, deficit  5.85, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  37.33, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAACAAUGGC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_98248.1, 10 NTs,           GUAACUAUGAC,score     -10.97, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.00, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35
CUAGGUUAACG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_19398.1,  9 NTs,           CAAGCGGUAAG,score     -11.29, deficit  2.82, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.17, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35     
GAUGUCAGAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -10.66, deficit  3.61, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.58, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
CCAAAAAUCAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -12.26, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.58, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUCUCAAUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_75091.3,  9 NTs,           GUUUGCGGGAC,score     -16.52, deficit  6.65, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.35, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35         
CGAACUACAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_67265.4, 10 NTs,           UUUGAUCCUGG,score     -14.21, deficit  7.02, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.87, ed 99, 4 cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGAUGAGAUGU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -12.17, deficit  3.03, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.48, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CUGUAACGCCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.95, deficit  8.44, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.42, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
GUAUCGCAGUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -11.41, deficit  4.40, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.11, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
UAAUAAAAGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.48, deficit  4.90, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  52.65, ed 99, 1 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUAAUAUGG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score     -11.36, deficit  2.21, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  17.88, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
CAACUUAUAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -14.16, deficit  5.60, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  29.57, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
AUGCAACGCUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -12.80, deficit  8.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  23.25, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
CGACUGAAGGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_11805.2, 11 NTs,           GGUCGGACAUC,score     -13.50, deficit  7.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.22, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35       
GUAUCAAAUUC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.64, deficit  5.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.76, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAUCAAUCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -13.32, deficit  6.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  16.03, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CUAAGUUAAUG 1  Matches  6; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -12.74, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.40, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
AGAUAAACCAU 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -12.75, deficit  5.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.09, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUACAAACAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.21, deficit  5.67, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   7.51, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GAGGAAACGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.78, deficit  4.80, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  27.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUGGAUAGCUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -15.09, deficit  7.58, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.70, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
CGAAAAAGAAG 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -10.06, deficit  2.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  43.44, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUGAAAACUCG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_78061.2, 10 NTs,            CUGCAACCCG,score     -13.46, deficit  8.95, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.67, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33 
AGAAAAGGUAU 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_49992.1, 10 NTs,           GAUCAGAAUGC,score     -10.96, deficit  3.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.82, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CAAAUAAACGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_98885.3, 10 NTs,           GAAGUGCACAC,score     -12.98, deficit  7.94, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.04, ed 99, 4 cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35       
GUAGAAUGCUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_04171.2, 10 NTs,           AUGAUAUGGUU,score     -13.73, deficit  6.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  13.99, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35
CAGAAAAUGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -12.26, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
GUUAGAACCUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -12.07, deficit  7.66, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  33.52, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAAGACAGCG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.70, deficit  4.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.61, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UGGGAAGAAAA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -12.02, deficit  4.04, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.19, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGUUGAUGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_18808.1,  5 NTs,           CAAUUGGAUAG,score     -12.45, deficit  2.18, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.30, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-cWS-s35                         
CAUUGAGCAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_50622.6, 11 NTs,           CCUUGAGGUGG,score      -9.15, deficit  0.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  47.97, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35 
GUAGUCAGACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72714.2, 11 NTs,          UAGGGAACGGGA,score     -11.89, deficit  3.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  15.91, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCCAACGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_72419.1, 11 NTs,           UUCCCAACGAG,score     -13.09, deficit  5.73, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  26.34, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35
CCGAUCCGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_36095.1,  9 NTs,           UUGAUAUGAUG,score     -12.89, deficit  5.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.07, ed 99, 3 cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55                 
UGAGGAGCAGA 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -13.83, deficit  6.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.34, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GUCGAAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_90620.1, 11 NTs,           AACCGUAAAAU,score     -11.09, deficit  4.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   8.08, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAGUUGGAAC 1  Matches  7; best is  HL_48376.3,  9 NTs,            CGUGUGGAAG,score     -12.63, deficit  5.32, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  22.38, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
UAACACUAAGG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -12.98, deficit  5.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  28.67, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
UUUAGGUGAUA 1  Matches  5; best is  HL_31286.3,  9 NTs,           UUUGGGGAAAG,score     -10.66, deficit  4.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  45.28, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAGACGCUUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_19958.1,  8 NTs,           GUAGUGGUAUC,score     -11.07, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.47, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35     
CCUUUACAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_43613.3,  7 NTs,           UUUAUUAAAAA,score     -11.62, deficit  5.11, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  25.05, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35         
CAGACCCUGAG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_10751.2,  8 NTs,           CAGCCUGGUAG,score     -14.13, deficit  8.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33                   
CAAACUGAGAAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -12.28, deficit  5.42, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.75, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
CAUUGAAACGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.18, deficit  5.93, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.42, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
CUGUCGAAAAUG 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -11.93, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.20, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
GGAUCCGAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -14.90, deficit  7.12, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  34.10, ed 99, 2 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GGCAAACAUAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_26772.1, 11 NTs,          CGAAUCCAUAAG,score     -13.61, deficit  3.88, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  19.15, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGCUCGGAAGAG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -14.60, deficit  5.62, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.94, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
GAAAAGUGAAAC 1  Matches  3; best is  HL_48962.1, 10 NTs,           CAAAAAUGAAG,score     -14.93, deficit  7.06, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.89, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53         
CUUGGGAGUCUG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_20714.1, 11 NTs,         AAUGGGAUGUCGU,score     -16.56, deficit  8.05, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  14.73, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGGUCAAGUGGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_02483.1, 10 NTs,          UGAUCACGAAGG,score     -15.16, deficit  7.38, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   2.67, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35         
GCUUUCCGUCCC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_25466.1, 11 NTs,          CAUUGCACUCCG,score     -13.81, deficit  6.56, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.03, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F           
GGGGCACAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -14.22, deficit  5.68, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.59, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGCGCUUAUCGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_43488.1, 11 NTs,          AACGCUUGCGUU,score     -15.90, deficit  7.59, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.97, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35
GUGUUGUAAUUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_56500.1,  9 NTs,           GUUUUGUAAUC,score     -13.87, deficit  6.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  21.56, ed 99, 2 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35         
CUAAGGGAGAUG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_08291.1, 11 NTs,          CUGACCGAUAUG,score     -13.54, deficit  6.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   5.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F
CGGCGCAAGUGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19162.2, 12 NTs,          GGAACACUAUAC,score     -16.82, deficit  8.28, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   3.80, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CUAAAAUCAACG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -17.35, deficit 10.16, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.18, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUAGCAAACAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_92304.3, 10 NTs,           CUUAGAAGCAG,score     -13.72, deficit  9.31, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.89, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
CGUUUUCUAAAG 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07268.1, 11 NTs,          CAAUUUAUACAG,score     -12.95, deficit  4.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.45, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35 
GGAAAAAAAAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_88982.1,  8 NTs,          CAAAAUAACAAG,score     -13.77, deficit  6.91, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.41, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35             
GGGAGCAAUAAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58733.1, 12 NTs,        CGGAGCGGCUGAAG,score     -15.91, deficit  5.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.35, ed 99, 4 cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35 
GUUAAAGUUACCC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_19870.4, 11 NTs,         CUAAAAGGUAACG,score     -14.44, deficit  7.26, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  18.72, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAGGUGGAGUC 1  Matches  2; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -17.21, deficit  6.20, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.02, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GGGGUUUGAACAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -16.26, deficit  5.29, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  10.16, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAAUUAGAAAACC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -14.85, deficit  3.89, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.89, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GGAAGGUUAGAAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_49873.1,  8 NTs,         GGAAUCGGUAGAC,score     -11.44, deficit  3.17, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  30.66, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35 
GAUCCGGAUGGAC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_96423.1, 10 NTs,          UAUCGGUUAGAG,score     -17.37, deficit  8.39, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.17, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35
AAGAUCGGGUGAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_17086.2, 13 NTs,         AAUGUAAAUACCU,score     -17.96, deficit  7.00, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.29, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GUCAGGAAUAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_07432.1, 11 NTs,        CUCAGCAGGUAGAG,score     -14.74, deficit  3.72, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   6.40, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35         
GUUCAAAGAAAAUC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_85984.1, 14 NTs,        UUUCAGAGAUGAGA,score     -18.05, deficit  7.81, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.77, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35
CGAUCUUGGUCAAGG 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12571.1, 13 NTs,       CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG,score     -19.27, deficit 10.64, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   1.79, ed 99, 3 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35
UUGAAUAAGGUAAUUA 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_58539.1, 15 NTs,      UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG,score     -16.87, deficit  7.13, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore  11.48, ed 99, 5 cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
GAUUGUGAGAUAAAAGC 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_30585.1, 16 NTs,     AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU,score     -17.37, deficit  4.63, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   0.35, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AGGAUCAAAGGCCAAAU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_52657.1, 15 NTs,     CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG,score     -19.36, deficit  7.70, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   9.20, ed 99, 5 cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
AUAUAGCGUAACAACUU 1  Matches  1; best is  HL_12710.1, 15 NTs,      GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC,score     -18.73, deficit  7.19, prct   0.00%, CutoffScore   4.07, ed 99, 4 cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35
4	100.0000	 87.0909	 79.6364	4
5	100.0000	 88.1818	 49.4545	23
6	100.0000	 87.4545	 51.0909	60
7	 99.4545	 52.9091	 16.0000	51
8	 99.4545	 27.8182	  4.1818	46
9	 98.3636	 17.6364	  1.4545	68
10	 95.2727	  7.4545	  0.1818	41
11	 82.5455	  3.2727	  0.0000	42
12	 42.7273	  0.3636	  0.0000	23
13	 17.6364	  0.5455	  0.0000	12
14	  5.8182	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
15	  1.0909	  0.0000	  0.0000	8
16	  2.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
17	  0.7273	  0.0000	  0.0000	4
18	  0.7273	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
19	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
20	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
21	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
22	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	2
23	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0
24	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
25	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
26	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	1
27	  0.0000	  0.0000	  0.0000	0





Model HL_00317.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  50.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_01925.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGGACGGUGCGGAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_03603.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUUUGUUGGUUUCU
Model HL_06137.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s35-cHW-cWH-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-cWH-s53-s35-s33-s55, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_07579.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.89%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACUUAUUUCCUUUGA
Model HL_46465.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-cHW-s55-s35-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-tWW-F-s55-cWH-s35-cWH-s35-tWW-s35-tHH-s53-s35-s53-tSW-s55-s55-s33-cSH-s35-s35, sequence AGGAAGGAUUGGUAUGUGGUAUAU
Model HL_59564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN 100.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGGCCUUUCUUAAAAAAAAA
Model HL_74088.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-s33-s33-cHW-cWH-s53-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-cWH-s35-cWH-s33-tSW-s55-s55-cHW-s33-cWH-s35-s33-cWH-F-s35-s33-s55-F, sequence UGUGGAAGGAGUGGCUGGGUUG
Model HL_79564.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN    NaN%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cHW-cWH-s53-s33-cWH-cHW-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-cHW-cWH-tSH-s35-cWH-s53-s33-s33-cHW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CGAAGGAGAGGAGAGGAAGAGGAGAG
Model HL_82866.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55-s35, sequence CAACUUAGGAUUUUAGG
Model HL_92488.1  matched a sequence   0 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACCGCCGAUAUGC
Model HL_12710.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s55-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAGCGUAAUAGCUC
Model HL_12773.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUGCAGUACCUC
Model HL_20751.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.15%,   2 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAGGGGAGGAAUCG
Model HL_38011.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUAGAAGCAGCC
Model HL_56677.4  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.36%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-tWH-s35-tSH-s55-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUGAACGCAUCUAAG
Model HL_81205.2  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.75%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CACUGAGACACGGG
Model HL_90257.1  matched a sequence   1 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGAAAAAAUUGGAAGUAG
Model HL_12870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.39%,   1 instances, signature cWW-tHW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUCCUUGGGAAAC
Model HL_30585.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-cSW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUCGCGUGAUAAAUGU
Model HL_68863.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.64%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence AGGUGGGGUUUAU
Model HL_82782.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  60.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s55-F-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUGACCGAAAGGCGUGAUG
Model HL_93221.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.70%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_98870.1  matched a sequence   2 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-s55-tWW-s35-F-s35-s53-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGUAGGCUACAGAGAAG
Model HL_85984.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence UUUCAGAGAUGAGA
Model HL_93650.1  matched a sequence   3 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.14%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUCCGAGUUGCAAG
Model HL_08602.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSS-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSS-s35-s55, sequence CAAUCCGCUCUAG
Model HL_12571.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.11%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-tSW-s35-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGAGCCUGGUCAAAG
Model HL_42211.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.58%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-F-F-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAUUGGUAGACA
Model HL_52657.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-tSH-s33-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGAUCAGUCACCCAAG
Model HL_58446.1  matched a sequence   4 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s53-F-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACCUAGAUCACCC
Model HL_35978.6  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.00%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58539.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  64.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-tWS-tHW-F-F-s55-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUAAAUUGGGCACUUG
Model HL_89082.1  matched a sequence   6 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.90%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGAAUACGACC
Model HL_28843.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGGCAGAAGUAA
Model HL_31581.4  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_58733.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.07%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s33-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-F-s35-s35, sequence CGGAGCGGCUGAAG
Model HL_94032.1  matched a sequence   7 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGUCUCUUUCG
Model HL_20714.1  matched a sequence   8 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGGGAUGUCGU
Model HL_07432.1  matched a sequence   9 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.36%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUCAGCAGGUAGAG
Model HL_10751.2  matched a sequence  10 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.62%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-s33, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_22443.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CCUGAGAAACGG
Model HL_70505.1  matched a sequence  12 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.66%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s35-F-s55-s35, sequence GAUCAGCCAUGC
Model HL_43488.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F-F-s35, sequence AACGCUUGCGUU
Model HL_60326.1  matched a sequence  13 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUUUACCAAAAUC
Model HL_86109.1  matched a sequence  14 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.30%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGCGGUGGGAGC
Model HL_96423.1  matched a sequence  15 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.04%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence UAUCGGUUAGAG
Model HL_22576.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s55-F-s55-s35-F-s35, sequence CCUAAUUAGUGG
Model HL_25466.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-F-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUGCACUCCG
Model HL_49873.1  matched a sequence  16 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-cWS-s35-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAUCGGUAGAC
Model HL_42671.1  matched a sequence  17 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.24%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s35, sequence AGCACGUGAAAUU
Model HL_72419.1  matched a sequence  18 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.12%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCCCAACGAG
Model HL_07268.1  matched a sequence  19 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s53-s53-s35-s35, sequence CAAUUUAUACAG
Model HL_03847.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.67%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUGGCGGUC
Model HL_30596.1  matched a sequence  21 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-s35-F, sequence UCUAUGAUACCA
Model HL_19870.4  matched a sequence  22 times, TP 100.00%, TN  97.18%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-tHH-s53-s53-tWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUAAAAGGUAACG
Model HL_38513.1  matched a sequence  25 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UCAAGCCUAG
Model HL_88982.1  matched a sequence  27 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence CAAAAUAACAAG
Model HL_11805.2  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s53-F-s35-s35, sequence GGUCGGACAUC
Model HL_20891.1  matched a sequence  28 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.37%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s33-F-s55-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAAUAUCGAAG
Model HL_19162.2  matched a sequence  29 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-F-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAACACUAUAC
Model HL_36421.4  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AGUUCAUAU
Model HL_52853.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGGCGGUUAG
Model HL_90620.1  matched a sequence  30 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s35-cSW-cSH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AACCGUAAAAU
Model HL_35188.1  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s33-F, sequence CAGCCUGGGAG
Model HL_98885.3  matched a sequence  31 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   3 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCACAC
Model HL_19398.1  matched a sequence  32 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-cWS-s35-cSH-s35, sequence CAAGCGGUAAG
Model HL_08291.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-F, sequence CUGACCGAUAUG
Model HL_17086.2  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAUGUAAAUACCU
Model HL_94607.1  matched a sequence  33 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s53, sequence GGCUCAUAACC
Model HL_19239.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-F-F-F-F, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_86843.1  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAGCGGUUAU
Model HL_92304.3  matched a sequence  34 times, TP 100.00%, TN  98.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUAGAAGCAG
Model HL_51284.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCAAGGAGAC
Model HL_98252.1  matched a sequence  35 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s55-tWW-s35-s53-s35-s55-s53, sequence AUUAUUUAUUU
Model HL_56500.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s55-cSH-s35, sequence GUUUUGUAAUC
Model HL_81820.1  matched a sequence  36 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.16%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-tHW-s35-tHW-s33-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAUCCAUAG
Model HL_26501.1  matched a sequence  37 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F-F, sequence CAGCUACUCG
Model HL_19958.1  matched a sequence  38 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-cWS-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAGUGGUAUC
Model HL_18808.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAAUUGGAUAG
Model HL_72451.4  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.87%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s35, sequence GGAACAAC
Model HL_98248.1  matched a sequence  39 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.71%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s55-s55-tHW-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s35, sequence GUAACUAUGAC
Model HL_02483.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-cSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCACGAAGG
Model HL_32255.1  matched a sequence  41 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s33-cWW-F-cSS-s53-s55-s35, sequence UUUUUUAAUG
Model HL_53037.1  matched a sequence  42 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-F-s55, sequence CUAUGGCUAUG
Model HL_51090.1  matched a sequence  46 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUCAG
Model HL_10536.1  matched a sequence  47 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence GUUGGAUAUC
Model HL_37846.1  matched a sequence  48 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCUG
Model HL_08510.1  matched a sequence  49 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s53-s53-F-s55, sequence AUGUGCUUU
Model HL_96854.1  matched a sequence  50 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s33-s35, sequence GACUCAACAC
Model HL_86378.1  matched a sequence  51 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH, sequence UUUCGUGUG
Model HL_29487.1  matched a sequence  52 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.79%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s55, sequence CUGAUG
Model HL_14725.1  matched a sequence  53 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUCAGUGUG
Model HL_48962.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-s35-s35-s53, sequence CAAAAAUGAAG
Model HL_97733.1  matched a sequence  54 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-cSH-s55, sequence CCCGGUCAGG
Model HL_02811.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence AGGGAUUUU
Model HL_24323.1  matched a sequence  56 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tWW-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGUGCAAC
Model HL_33239.14 matched a sequence  57 times, TP  96.30%, TN  96.01%, 108 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUUC
Model HL_63693.1  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGCAUAACAA
Model HL_67216.4  matched a sequence  57 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.82%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAG
Model HL_23537.2  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.02%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s35-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUCCCAAGCC
Model HL_58200.1  matched a sequence  59 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence CCUCACACG
Model HL_41778.1  matched a sequence  61 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35-tSW, sequence UAGAGGCCCAG
Model HL_36095.1  matched a sequence  62 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s55-s33-F-F-s55, sequence UUGAUAUGAUG
Model HL_50622.6  matched a sequence  64 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUGAGGUGG
Model HL_17956.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s55-tHS-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence UGAUCAAUGAG
Model HL_23481.4  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-F-s35, sequence GAAACAUC
Model HL_33172.1  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-F, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_78061.2  matched a sequence  65 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s33, sequence CUGCAACCCG
Model HL_26772.1  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s55-s33-s35-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAAUCCAUAAG
Model HL_91503.2  matched a sequence  67 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence GUUCGUGGAGC
Model HL_05123.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACGGGGAGUU
Model HL_15968.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35-s53-F, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_41851.1  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s33-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence CCUUACGAG
Model HL_67265.4  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGAUCCUGG
Model HL_72714.2  matched a sequence  69 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UAGGGAACGGGA
Model HL_36207.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s35-s35-s33-s55, sequence CCUUUCACG
Model HL_53499.1  matched a sequence  70 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-F, sequence CAGCUGGGAG
Model HL_50537.2  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUGUUAAU
Model HL_92681.4  matched a sequence  71 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAGAAG
Model HL_09712.1  matched a sequence  73 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence UUCUGCGG
Model HL_31286.3  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUGGGGAAAG
Model HL_59710.7  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  32 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCAUAAC
Model HL_80705.1  matched a sequence  75 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWW-s35-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUCCUCGCG
Model HL_43613.3  matched a sequence  76 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-tWH-s53-s35, sequence UUUAUUAAAAA
Model HL_18785.1  matched a sequence  77 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.83%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35, sequence UAAGGG
Model HL_02733.4  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAUGCCG
Model HL_04171.2  matched a sequence  78 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence AUGAUAUGGUU
Model HL_27359.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CAGCCUGGUAG
Model HL_32458.2  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUUCGAAUCC
Model HL_73235.1  matched a sequence  79 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-s55, sequence CAGCACUUUG
Model HL_59445.1  matched a sequence  80 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-s35-s35, sequence CAAUAGG
Model HL_91131.1  matched a sequence  81 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUUUGGAC
Model HL_49213.1  matched a sequence  82 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s55-s33-tHW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAUGAAC
Model HL_43074.14 matched a sequence  83 times, TP  97.44%, TN  95.97%, 273 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_70682.1  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s53-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCAAGAUUC
Model HL_73266.3  matched a sequence  83 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-cSW-cSH-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACCGUAAAU
Model HL_01008.4  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F, sequence GAUCAC
Model HL_39334.4  matched a sequence  85 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s33-s35-s33-cWS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUGAAAAG
Model HL_37694.1  matched a sequence  86 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUCGAAUC
Model HL_73051.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-cWH-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAGGAGGUC
Model HL_97049.1  matched a sequence  87 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-cSH, sequence CAGUCGGUAG
Model HL_41207.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s53-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s53-s33-s35, sequence UCUUUAAAA
Model HL_93436.1  matched a sequence  88 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.84%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence GUUCGAUCC
Model HL_55511.1  matched a sequence  89 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s53, sequence UAACGGUAG
Model HL_30819.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-tSS-s55-s33-s53-s55, sequence AUUGAGAGCU
Model HL_49992.1  matched a sequence  90 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUCAGAAUGC
Model HL_79299.9  matched a sequence  90 times, TP  98.08%, TN  95.66%,  52 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_35888.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35-s35, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_44911.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-F-F, sequence AGGCAAUU
Model HL_49223.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAAAGC
Model HL_67044.1  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s33-F-s35, sequence AUGUCGUUU
Model HL_90642.4  matched a sequence  91 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GUGAAGAUGC
Model HL_06048.1  matched a sequence  92 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSS-s55-s35-s35, sequence CAAGAAAGAG
Model HL_36552.1  matched a sequence  93 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-s55-F, sequence CCUCCUAAG
Model HL_23090.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACAUAAG
Model HL_55046.1  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s55, sequence GUUUAUC
Model HL_78457.3  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUAAUAUUC
Model HL_81327.2  matched a sequence  95 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35, sequence CAGCCGGUAG
Model HL_44769.1  matched a sequence  96 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.74%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCACGGAG
Model HL_48810.1  matched a sequence  97 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGCUGGUUAG
Model HL_48376.3  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGUGUGGAAG
Model HL_49816.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s33, sequence GAAAGACC
Model HL_78724.1  matched a sequence  98 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s35, sequence AAAAUCACU
Model HL_30937.1  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUAACGC
Model HL_38646.2  matched a sequence  99 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAUGC
Model HL_17926.4  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUAAGUAA
Model HL_34135.1  matched a sequence 100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUUUUGAUA
Model HL_76406.3  matched a sequence 102 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s53-s53-cWH-s55-s35, sequence GACAGAGAC
Model HL_03427.1  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35-s35-s33, sequence UCUCAUAAG
Model HL_87219.4  matched a sequence 103 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUUAGAUACC
Model HL_32512.6  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GACUGGC
Model HL_68742.1  matched a sequence 104 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.78%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCCAAG
Model HL_23219.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-cSH-s55-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence CGUUAAUG
Model HL_27757.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s55-F, sequence CGGAAAGG
Model HL_68478.1  matched a sequence 105 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.92%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GCUUGC
Model HL_08748.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-tSH-s33-s35-s35-F-s35-s35, sequence ACUCAUACU
Model HL_72066.1  matched a sequence 106 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-tWH-s33-F-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGUUCAAAG
Model HL_01187.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.10%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GAAUUAAC
Model HL_61092.1  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-F-F, sequence CAGUUGGGAG
Model HL_99402.3  matched a sequence 107 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cSH-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAUUACCUG
Model HL_05832.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GCGAAAGAC
Model HL_96487.1  matched a sequence 108 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.42%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CAUGUAG
Model HL_35010.1  matched a sequence 109 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35-cSH-s35-s35, sequence CUUGCAAAG
Model HL_08002.5  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  14 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-F-F-s35-s35, sequence GUAGAGUC
Model HL_49194.1  matched a sequence 110 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.93%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGACGAUC
Model HL_17899.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUGUCUAC
Model HL_63285.1  matched a sequence 111 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-tSH-s35-s35-F-s35, sequence GUUAAAAC
Model HL_06920.1  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_46891.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUGGUUGU
Model HL_66171.2  matched a sequence 112 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.97%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGACACAG
Model HL_06645.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-F-F-s35, sequence CUUCAACG
Model HL_26055.5  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  15 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUCUAC
Model HL_27335.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_34974.1  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55-s55, sequence CUUCGG
Model HL_93727.3  matched a sequence 114 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  22 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUGGCUC
Model HL_05018.4  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAGACCAC
Model HL_35491.2  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_83225.1  matched a sequence 115 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.88%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGUAUUG
Model HL_43610.4  matched a sequence 116 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s33-F-s35, sequence GGAGACC
Model HL_20743.2  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGAUAUGGC
Model HL_93551.1  matched a sequence 117 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-F-s35-s35-s55, sequence CAUGGACG
Model HL_48636.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-F-cWH-s55, sequence UGUGAGAGG
Model HL_66703.1  matched a sequence 118 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s53-s35, sequence UGGCUAAAA
Model HL_27747.3  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.86%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s53-s55-cSH, sequence AGAAAUU
Model HL_46771.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-tSS-cSS-s55-s35, sequence AUUGAAAAU
Model HL_69677.1  matched a sequence 119 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.85%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F, sequence CUUUUUG
Model HL_83704.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-cSS-s35-F, sequence GGUGAAUGAC
Model HL_90197.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.69%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-s35, sequence UGUAGG
Model HL_94651.1  matched a sequence 120 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSS-s35-s55, sequence CGUUCUAG
Model HL_67052.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUCUAAAU
Model HL_67205.1  matched a sequence 122 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.63%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s53, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_28085.1  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.72%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-F, sequence CAGUAAAUG
Model HL_53760.2  matched a sequence 123 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s33-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GGUAAGUUC
Model HL_88225.1  matched a sequence 124 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWS-s35-s35, sequence CAGGGGUAG
Model HL_59297.1  matched a sequence 125 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-F-F, sequence GCUUAGGC
Model HL_01181.4  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCACCGUC
Model HL_50374.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UAAUUCA
Model HL_73793.2  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tWH-s35-tWH-s33-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAUAAAAGC
Model HL_88858.1  matched a sequence 126 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-bif-s35-tSW-s55-s35, sequence CCUGAUAAG
Model HL_18495.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGCAGAU
Model HL_68493.4  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.01%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tWH-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence CUGGGAUG
Model HL_93229.1  matched a sequence 128 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGAG
Model HL_54035.5  matched a sequence 129 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s35, sequence AUUGAGUU
Model HL_01472.3  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-F-s55-s53, sequence GUCCGGC
Model HL_93573.1  matched a sequence 130 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.52%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35, sequence CCUUGUG
Model HL_33612.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cWH-F-F-s55, sequence CUUUUGG
Model HL_37407.1  matched a sequence 131 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAUC
Model HL_15942.4  matched a sequence 133 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.34%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence UUUAGG
Model HL_50959.1  matched a sequence 135 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.91%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAUGAG
Model HL_46463.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.57%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence UUUCGA
Model HL_77081.1  matched a sequence 136 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.75%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSW-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGAAAAG
Model HL_75091.3  matched a sequence 137 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence GUUUGCGGGAC
Model HL_56089.1  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55-cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence CCGAAUAG
Model HL_69774.3  matched a sequence 138 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.65%,   5 instances, signature cWW-s33-tSW-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAACAC
Model HL_35894.3  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s33-F-s35, sequence UAGUAA
Model HL_49196.2  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence AUUCCCAUU
Model HL_90961.1  matched a sequence 141 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s55, sequence CGCAUAG
Model HL_24625.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence CAGUG
Model HL_84050.1  matched a sequence 142 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.98%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-cSH-s55, sequence CCAGUUAG
Model HL_80105.3  matched a sequence 147 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.90%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUUCGGU
Model HL_16845.5  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-tHH-s53-s35-s35, sequence CUUAUCG
Model HL_51033.1  matched a sequence 153 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGUCUC
Model HL_25183.1  matched a sequence 154 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.06%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence CUGUUCG
Model HL_24403.1  matched a sequence 156 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.38%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GAAAAUC
Model HL_68529.1  matched a sequence 158 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.84%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence GAGUCC
Model HL_60357.1  matched a sequence 161 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.87%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence GUAUUC
Model HL_60140.1  matched a sequence 162 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.99%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-s35-s35-s35, sequence ACUGAAGAU
Model HL_58912.1  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CUGUUG
Model HL_86769.2  matched a sequence 164 times, TP 100.00%, TN  95.95%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-cSS-s35-cSH-s55, sequence AGGGUCAU
Model HL_41285.1  matched a sequence 165 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.81%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-s35, sequence GAACUC
Model HL_42733.3  matched a sequence 172 times, TP 100.00%, TN  96.00%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGGCGAAAG
Model HL_44730.2  matched a sequence 178 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.96%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CCUUGG
Model HL_32617.1  matched a sequence 188 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.75%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSH, sequence UUGGUA
Model HL_69818.1  matched a sequence 197 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.47%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_12053.1  matched a sequence 199 times, TP 100.00%, TN  94.41%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCAACG
Model HL_30541.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.29%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F, sequence CAUUCG
Model HL_52240.1  matched a sequence 204 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.40%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence AAAUUU
Model HL_44781.1  matched a sequence 205 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.24%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-cWH-s53-s35-s35, sequence GUUCAC
Model HL_80171.1  matched a sequence 208 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.43%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s53-s35-s35-s33, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_82678.2  matched a sequence 218 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-F-F, sequence CAUGUGG
Model HL_62869.2  matched a sequence 222 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.78%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GGGAAC
Model HL_00996.1  matched a sequence 223 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.30%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence GUCUUC
Model HL_25660.1  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  93.45%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-F-s35, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_46142.7  matched a sequence 233 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.37%,  20 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UUACUUGA
Model HL_96283.1  matched a sequence 240 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.53%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUUAUG
Model HL_14859.1  matched a sequence 242 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F-F, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_56387.1  matched a sequence 259 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.44%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWH-s35-s53-s55, sequence AUUUU
Model HL_53189.1  matched a sequence 265 times, TP 100.00%, TN  85.51%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s53, sequence CUCUG
Model HL_98995.6  matched a sequence 266 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.01%,   9 instances, signature cWW-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence UACCAA
Model HL_69941.1  matched a sequence 269 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_76360.1  matched a sequence 278 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.19%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F-F, sequence GUGUCC
Model HL_04891.1  matched a sequence 283 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGAGAG
Model HL_43527.1  matched a sequence 291 times, TP 100.00%, TN  92.16%,   2 instances, signature cWW-cSH-s35-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGCCGAG
Model HL_32527.2  matched a sequence 301 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.59%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35, sequence GGAAAC
Model HL_18218.2  matched a sequence 309 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.92%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-bif-F-F-s35, sequence GCCUAGGAC
Model HL_70970.1  matched a sequence 314 times, TP 100.00%, TN  91.28%,   2 instances, signature cWW-F-F-s35, sequence UCUAA
Model HL_14286.1  matched a sequence 316 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence CGGAUG
Model HL_86880.4  matched a sequence 326 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.90%,  12 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35-s35, sequence GCUCGUC
Model HL_40469.1  matched a sequence 343 times, TP 100.00%, TN  90.30%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F, sequence CGAAUAG
Model HL_96776.2  matched a sequence 351 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.95%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cSW-s35-s35-F, sequence AAAAUU
Model HL_69459.1  matched a sequence 360 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.89%,   1 instances, signature cWW, sequence CGCGUG
Model HL_16898.2  matched a sequence 362 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.99%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSW-s35-s55, sequence UGAAAGG
Model HL_33507.2  matched a sequence 365 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.01%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-s55, sequence UUUUA
Model HL_02361.5  matched a sequence 380 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.81%,  16 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence UGAACAA
Model HL_28567.3  matched a sequence 386 times, TP 100.00%, TN  89.35%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GAGUAC
Model HL_12703.2  matched a sequence 387 times, TP 100.00%, TN  88.54%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s35-s35, sequence GGCCC
Model HL_22515.1  matched a sequence 391 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.44%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-F, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_79272.2  matched a sequence 394 times, TP 100.00%, TN  79.73%,  11 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s33-s35, sequence CGCAG
Model HL_57204.1  matched a sequence 403 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.20%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-F-s35, sequence UGGAAA
Model HL_46546.1  matched a sequence 422 times, TP 100.00%, TN  83.15%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s33-F-s35, sequence CUUG
Model HL_53987.3  matched a sequence 424 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.17%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-cWS-s35, sequence CUUAG
Model HL_94352.4  matched a sequence 430 times, TP 100.00%, TN  87.05%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-F-F, sequence CUAAGUG
Model HL_62604.1  matched a sequence 483 times, TP 100.00%, TN  86.94%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-s53-s53-s35, sequence UGAAAA
Model HL_68304.6  matched a sequence 495 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.45%,   8 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55-tSH-s35-s35-s35, sequence CGACGAG
Model HL_05692.1  matched a sequence 496 times, TP 100.00%, TN  81.31%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CGUAGG
Model HL_36982.3  matched a sequence 550 times, TP 100.00%, TN  78.34%,  10 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUGUG
Model HL_94386.1  matched a sequence 562 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.73%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-F-F-s35, sequence GUGAAGC
Model HL_99223.1  matched a sequence 568 times, TP 100.00%, TN  76.92%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s33-s55-s35, sequence UUUAA
Model HL_57052.2  matched a sequence 572 times, TP 100.00%, TN  75.19%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35, sequence GUCAC
Model HL_69353.6  matched a sequence 589 times, TP 100.00%, TN  68.81%,  17 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUAG
Model HL_95237.1  matched a sequence 591 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.95%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s33-s35-s35, sequence UUUGA
Model HL_06569.1  matched a sequence 595 times, TP 100.00%, TN  82.49%,   4 instances, signature cWW-s35-tSH-s35-s55-s35, sequence AGAAUU
Model HL_60914.1  matched a sequence 604 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.56%,   1 instances, signature cWW-F-F, sequence CUGGG
Model HL_61984.1  matched a sequence 604 times, TP 100.00%, TN  77.73%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CUCGG
Model HL_02906.1  matched a sequence 610 times, TP 100.00%, TN  84.26%,   2 instances, signature cWW-s35-s33-s35-s55-s35, sequence UGUAAG
Model HL_98557.4  matched a sequence 805 times, TP 100.00%, TN  70.07%,   7 instances, signature cWW-s35-s55, sequence CAGAG
Model HL_18722.1  matched a sequence 807 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.50%,   3 instances, signature cWW-s35-F, sequence GUCUC
Model HL_05667.1  matched a sequence 899 times, TP 100.00%, TN  67.15%,   1 instances, signature cWW-s55, sequence GGUAC
Model HL_22447.1  matched a sequence 1100 times, TP 100.00%, TN  66.20%,   6 instances, signature cWW-s35-s53-s55, sequence UUUUCA
Overall false positive rate is 35.2424%
Number of models giving false positives is 299 out of 310
Rate at which sequences have interior edit distance 0 is     8.42
Rate at which sequences have cutoff score greater than 50 is    15.53
